PATEL v. LIU et al
| KASHYAP PATEL and ROD ROSENSTEIN |
| JESSIE K. LIU, ROBERT HUR, ED O'CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2 |
| 1:2023cv02699 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/07/2023. (Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JESSIE K. LIU served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023 (Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/31/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/30/2023. (Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ED O'CALLAHAN served on 10/31/2023, answer due 11/21/2023 (Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to ROBERT HUR, ED O'CALLAHAN, ROD ROSENSTEIN, JESSIE K. LIU, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mg) Modified text on 10/27/2023 (mg). |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by KASHYAP PATEL. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by KASHYAP PATEL.(Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re Order,, filed by KASHYAP PATEL. (Greaves, Jason) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ROBERT HUR, JESSIE K. LIU, ED O'CALLAHAN, ROD ROSENSTEIN, CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to jason@binnall.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (zsl, ) |
MINUTE ORDER. Judge Mehta makes the following disclosures that may be relevant to his capacity to preside over this matter. Judge Mehta's spouse is a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, which represents former FBI agent Peter Strzok. Further, Judge Mehta is presently a member of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, but was not during the relevant period set forth in the Complaint. Plaintiff's counsel shall advise the court by September 25, 2023, whether the foregoing, in Plaintiff's view, warrants Judge Mehta's recusal. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/19/2023. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 2 Case randomly reassigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. Judge Rudolph Contreras is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2, ROBERT HUR, JESSIE K. LIU, ED O'CALLAHAN, ROD ROSENSTEIN, CHRISTOPHER WRAY with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10353161) filed by KASHYAP PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Google Notice and Subpoena, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Greaves, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
