TORRES v. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT et al
| MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES |
| AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, JEFFREY LEHRER and ROBERT HORVATH |
| 1:2023cv02700 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES (zsl) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Permission to Use Post Office Box (See docket entry #4 to view document) by MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES. (zsl) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES. (zsl) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 09/22/2023. (zcb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MAUREEN TAMARA TORRES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement of Claim, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(zcb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 09/14/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
