AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
| AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION |
| UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION |
| 1:2023cv02765 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bardo, John) |
MINUTE ORDER granting the defendant's #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. The defendant shall file its answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before November 29, 2023. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on October 26, 2023. (lcdlf2)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION filed by AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Supplement redline comparison of the original and amended pleading)(Ding, Michael) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/10/2023. (Ding, Michael) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION served on 10/6/2023 (Ding, Michael) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/28/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/28/2023. (Ding, Michael) |
|
Filing 3
STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 21, 2023. (lcdlf2)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10366935) filed by AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Ding, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION | |
| Represented By: | Michael Ding |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | John Bardo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
