JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
1:2023cv02846 |
September 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.(Shapiro, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth J. Shapiro on behalf of All Defendants (Shapiro, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Allyson Scher on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (Scher, Allyson) |
MINUTE ORDER. Service on the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia was effected by email on October 12, 2023. See Decl. of Cristina Rotaru 4, Dkt. 7-1. Under Rule 12(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[t]he United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer or employee sued only in an official capacity must serve an answer to a complaint, counterclaim, or crossclaim within 60 days after service on the United States attorney." Accordingly, the defendant shall file its answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before December 11, 2023. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on November 13, 2023. (lcdlf2) |
MINUTE ORDER requiring the parties to MEET AND CONFER and file a Meet and Confer report proposing a schedule for further proceedings. The report should address the status of the plaintiff's FOIA request, including the anticipated number of documents responsive to the request and the anticipated date(s) for release of the requested documents. The parties shall file the Meet and Confer report on or before December 13, 2023. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on November 13, 2023. (lcdlf2) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/12/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/11/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/18/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 10/23/2023 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cristina Rotaru)(Francescon, Patrick) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney. (mg) Modified docket text on 10/13/2023 (mg). |
Filing 5 STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 28, 2023. (lcdlf2) |
Filing 4 ERRATA to USAO Summons by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. re #1 Complaint,. (Francescon, Patrick) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zljn) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Francescon, Patrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-10378612 ) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Agency, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons USAO)(Francescon, Patrick) Modified on 10/4/2023 to correct payment information (zljn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.