DOE A et al v. SPAHN
| John Doe A, John Doe B and John Doe C |
| CAROL SPAHN |
| 1:2023cv02859 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 10/10/2023. (lccjn3)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to CAROL SPAHN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; emailed to bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Please note the following for future filings; do not refile document, 2. Future filings may be ENTERED IN ERROR, 3. Invalid attorney signature; signature on document must match PACER log in. (znmw, ) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Plaintiffs' #2 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms is GRANTED, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned; (2) All parties shall use the pseudonyms listed in the Complaint in all documents filed in this action; and (3) Within fourteen days of this Order, Plaintiffs shall file on the public docket a pseudonymous version of their #2 Motion and any attachments. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/2/2023. (lcjeb4)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zsl) |
| Filing 6 ERRATA by John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C re #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration for Admission Pro Hac Vice - Megan Schuller, #2 Exhibit Megan Schuller Certificate of Good Standing In Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice, #3 Errata Notice of Errata re Docket Entry No. 4, #4 Certificate of Service)(Schwartz, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Anashua Dutta, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10385280. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Anashua Dutta Certificate of Good Standing in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice, #3 Certificate of Service)(Schwartz, Bryan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Megan Schuller, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10385151. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration for Admission Pro Hac Vice - Megan Schuller, #2 Exhibit Megan Schuller Certificate of Good Standing In Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice, #3 Certificate of Service)(Schwartz, Bryan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ira A. Burnim on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Burnim, Ira) |
| Filing 2 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.), SEALED MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schwartz, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAROL SPAHN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10379338) filed by John Doe A, John Doe C, John Doe B. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Schwartz, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
