KHOSHNOOD v. BLINKEN et al
| MEHRAN KHOSHNOOD |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, GARLAND MERRICK, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, RICHARD VISEK, CHIP LAITINEN and MATHEW GRAVES |
| 1:2023cv02936 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 10/4/23. (lcrdm2)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, MATTHEW M. GRAVES, CHIP LAITINEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10393453) filed by MEHRAN KHOSHNOOD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Aramesh, Arash) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/3/2023) (zljn). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
