NGUEDI v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT et al
| GERARD NGUEDI |
| ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT and GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY |
| 1:2023cv02965 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY waiver sent on 11/17/2023, answer due 1/16/2024. (zjm) |
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to properly serve General Dynamics Information Technology ("GDIT"). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e), a corporation may be served according to the "state law for serving a summons" "in the state where the district court is located." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P 4(h)(1)(A) (explaining that a corporation may be served "in the manner prescribed by Rule 4(e)(1) for serving an individual"). District of Columbia law permits corporations to be served by certified mail but requires the mail to be sent "return receipt requested," Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 4(c)(4), and the signed receipt to be attached to an affidavit filed with the Court, id. 4(l)(B). Furthermore, among other requirements laid out in Rule 4(l)(B), either the return receipt must be signed by the party named in the summons or the accompanying affidavit must state "specific facts from which the court can determine that the person who signed the receipt meets the appropriate qualifications for receipt of process." Id. 4(l)(B)(iv). Plaintiff has not attached a signed return receipt to his affidavit. Plaintiff shall have until January 15, 2024 to file proof of proper service--whether by certified mail return receipt requested or other means, such as through a professional process server. Failure to file proof of proper service may result in dismissal of the claims against GDIT. SO ORDERED by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 12/1/2023. (lccrc3)
|
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY served on 11/8/2023, answer due 11/29/2023 (See Docket Entry #4 to view documents) (zjm) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY served on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023 (See Docket Entry #4 to view document) (zjm) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT served on 10/2/2023 (See Docket Entry #4 to view document) (zjm) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by GERARD NGUEDI. (See Docket Entry #4 to view document) (zjm) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/13/2023. (zjm) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zrtw) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. Weeks after moving to proceed "without prepayment of fees or security therefor," 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff paid the $402 filing fee for this civil action. Therefore, Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 2, is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/25/2023. (psu1)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zrtw) |
| Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number: 205830. (zrtw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GERARD NGUEDI. (zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by GERARD NGUEDI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(zljn) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/02/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
