JOURDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
MARGARET JOURDAN |
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KENVUE INC. and COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION |
1:2023cv03047 |
October 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (znmw) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by MARGARET JOURDAN. Case related to Case No. 1:21-cv-02760 and MDL No. 2738. (Parfitt, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., KENVUE INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10417705) filed by MARGARET JOURDAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons JJ, #3 Summons JJ HoldCo, #4 Summons LTL, #5 Summons Janssen, #6 Summons Kenvue, #7 Summons PCPC)(Parfitt, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.