HILLS v. MASON et al
| ROLAND HILLS |
| CHERYL L. MASON, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO, LISA BARONIO and SYLVESTER JONES |
| 1:2023cv03157 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Advising pro se Plaintiff of his obligation to follow the FRCP, Local Rules and orders of the court. Failure to adhere to these rules or orders may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/03/2023. (lcd)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, LISA BARONIO, SYLVESTER JONES, CHERYL L. MASON. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ROLAND HILLS.(zjm) |
| Filing 2 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by ROLAND HILLS (zjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, LISA BARONIO, SYLVESTER JONES, CHERYL L. MASON ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 205901) filed by ROLAND HILLS. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, LISA BARONIO, SYLVESTER JONES, CHERYL L. MASON (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
