ROZARIO v. QMI FOOD, INC. et al
| ROBERT ROZARIO |
| QMI FOOD, INC. doing business as SHARKS FISH & CHICKEN, MMI FOOD, INC. doing business as SHARKS FISH & CHICKEN, Pennbranch, Inc. doing business as SHARKS FISH & CHICKEN and MOHAMMED A. QUAYUM |
| 1:2023cv03229 |
| October 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. Pennbranch, Inc. served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. QMI FOOD, INC. served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 3
STANDARD ORDER. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on October 31, 2023. (lcdlf3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zdp) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10454536) filed by ROBERT ROZARIO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (4))(Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
