BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| ANDRE L. BARNES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR. |
| 1:2023cv03337 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Ana C. Reyes on 11/09/2023. (zljn)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ana C. Reyes on 11/09/2023. (zljn) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by ANDRE L. BARNES (zdp) Modified on 11/7/2023 (zdp). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANDRE L. BARNES. (zdp) Modified on 11/7/2023 (zdp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by ANDRE L. BARNES. (Attachments: #1 Errata)(zdp) Modified on 11/7/2023 (zdp). |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/07/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zdp) Modified on 11/7/2023 (zdp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
