CHOI v. JADDOU et al
TAE YOUNG CHOI |
UR M. JADDOU, ALISSA EMMEL, KAREN KARAS, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and DONALD NEUFELD |
1:2023cv03373 |
November 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Jia M Cobb |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by TAE YOUNG CHOI (Shin, Soung) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zdp) |
Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zrtw) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET MANDAMUS PETITION by TAE YOUNG CHOI filed by TAE YOUNG CHOI.(Shin, Soung) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; emailed to sjshin.esq@gmail.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zdp, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10486105) filed by TAE YOUNG CHOI. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Shin, Soung) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.