SCHREIER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
JESSIE SCHREIER |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY |
1:2023cv03399 |
November 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due by January 23, 2024. (ztl) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond by CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Adebonojo, Kenneth) |
MINUTE ORDER: Granting Defendants' #3 Consent Motion for Extension. Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due by January 23, 2024. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/18/2023. (lcd) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10489032) filed by JESSIE SCHREIER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Pratt, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.