RAMACHANDRAN v. BLINKEN et al
| RAKESH AMMANATH RAMACHANDRAN |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ERIC GARCETTI, MICHAEL HANKEY, JOHN DOE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, MERRICK GARLAND and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS |
| 1:2023cv03431 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Siu Wong on behalf of RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, ERIC GARCETTI, MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HANKEY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY (Wong, Siu) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Molina, Ernesto) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RAKESH AMMANATH RAMACHANDRAN re #2 LCvR 26.1 Certificate of Disclosure - Corporate Affiliations/Financial Interests . (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY served on 11/20/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 11/21/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL HANKEY served on 11/20/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ERIC GARCETTI served on 11/20/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. RENA BITTER served on 11/20/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY J. BLINKEN served on 11/20/2023 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/20/2023. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/20/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/19/2024. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ERIC GARCETTI, MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HANKEY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by RAKESH AMMANATH RAMACHANDRAN (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, ERIC GARCETTI, MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HANKEY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10496393) filed by RAKESH AMMANATH RAMACHANDRAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table and Exhibits A to G, #2 Summons for U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, #3 Summons for Assistant Secretary of State Rena Bitter, #4 Summons for U.S. Ambassador Eric Garcetti, #5 Summons for U.S. Consul General Michael Hankey, #6 Summons for NIV Officer John Doe, #7 Summons for U.S. Secretary of Homeland Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, #8 Summons for FBI Director Christopher Wray, #9 Summons for US Attorney General Merrick Garland, #10 Summons for the Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney's Office)(Rosen, Adam) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
