HAILEMARIAM v. GW MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC.
ADOME L HAILEMARIAM |
MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC. and GW MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC. |
1:2023cv03440 |
November 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by GW MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baldwin, Raymond) |
MINUTE ORDER. The #3 Consent Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before January 9, 2024. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on December 19, 2023. (lccjn2) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by GW MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baldwin, Raymond) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to GW MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10498142) filed by ADOME L HAILEMARIAM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons)(Sutter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.