AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT v. UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT |
UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2023cv03482 |
November 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Escher, Sam) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION served on 11/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Tracking)(Dorey, David) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/28/23. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt of Service)(Dorey, David) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/21/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt of Service)(Dorey, David) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 19, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 12/14/2023. (lcrc1) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Tessa Elizabeth Shurr on behalf of AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT (Shurr, Tessa) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10507015) filed by AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons United States Transportation Security Administration, #6 Summons U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, #7 Summons Attorney General of the United States)(Dorey, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT v. UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT | |
Represented By: | David Richard Dorey |
Represented By: | Tessa Elizabeth Shurr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
Represented By: | Sam Escher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.