DE JESUS GARCIA v. KIJAKAZI
| VIRGILIO DE JESUS GARCIA |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2023cv03529 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XV1 |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD- Social Security by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 2, #2 Exhibit Part 3, #3 Exhibit Part 4, #4 Exhibit Part 5, #5 Exhibit Part 6, #6 Exhibit Part 7, #7 Exhibit Part 8, #8 Exhibit Part 9)(Elliott, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Elliott on behalf of KILOLO KIJAKAZI (Elliott, Scott) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zdp) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI Electronic notice has been provided to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the U.S. Attorney's Office pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405g.Answer due by 1/30/2024, (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10518031) filed by VIRGILIO DE JESUS GARCIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Ekblom, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
