PARKS et al v. MAYORKAS
| MICHAEL PARKS, CHAD SUTTON, SUKEENA STEPHENS and FREEMAN JORDAN |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS |
| 1:2023cv03561 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 12/1/2023. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10526443) filed by MICHAEL PARKS, SUKEENA STEPHENS, CHAD SUTTON, and FREEMAN JORDAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Complaint, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Complaint, #6 Summons Summons to DHS, #7 Summons Summons to DOJ, #8 Summons Summons to USATTY)(Keith, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
