HEWA KODIPPILIGE v. BLINKEN et al
ACHINI HEWA KODIPPILIGE |
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DOUG SONNEK and JOHN DOE |
1:2023cv03573 |
November 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, DOUG SONNEK (Molina, Ernesto) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/23/2024) (mg). |
![]() |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, DOUG SONNEK, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zrtw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, DOUG SONNEK ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10530096) filed by ACHINI HEWA KODIPPILIGE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #4 Summons SUMMON FOR U.S. ATTORNEY, #5 Summons SUMMONS FOR ATT. GENERAL, #6 Summons SUMMONS FOR ANTONY J. BLINKEN, #7 Summons SUMMONS FOR RENA BITTER, #8 Summons SUMMONS FOR DOUG SONNEK, #9 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Ahmed, Sadaf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.