DOSHI et al v. BLINKEN et al
| TOM DOSHI, XHOVANA DOSHI, BRIANA DOSHI, JAMES DOSHI, MARCOS DOSHI and LUIS DOSHI |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN and UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2023cv03613 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by BRIANA DOSHI, JAMES DOSHI, LUIS DOSHI, MARCOS DOSHI, TOM DOSHI, XHOVANA DOSHI. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kucik, Peter) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Plaintiffs' Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule shall govern further proceedings: Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' partial motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before February 26, 2024; and Defendants' reply in support of their partial motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before April 3, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/22/2024. (lcrc1)
|
| Filing 8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ely, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander N. Ely on behalf of All Defendants (Ely, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/13/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/11/2024. (Kucik, Peter) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/13/2023. (Kucik, Peter) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY J. BLINKEN served on 12/13/2023; UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT served on 12/13/2023 (Kucik, Peter) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zrtw) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT filed by BRIANA DOSHI, JAMES DOSHI, LUIS DOSHI, MARCOS DOSHI, TOM DOSHI, XHOVANA DOSHI re #1 Complaint, (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Kucik, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10538384) filed by LUIS DOSHI, BRIANA DOSHI, XHOVANA DOSHI, JAMES DOSHI, TOM DOSHI, MARCOS DOSHI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Kucik, Peter) (Attachment 8 replaced on 12/5/2023) (zrtw). |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to kucik@falawpc.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zrtw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
