RUIZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
| MARTIN MORENO RUIZ |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND COUNTER TERRORISM and U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
| 1:2023cv03631 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on 12/14/2023. (zljn)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on 12/14/2023. (zljn) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARTIN MORENO RUIZ. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND COUNTER TERRORISM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS filed by MARTIN MORENO RUIZ. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(zcb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/04/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
