MCLAURIN v. LYFT, INC.
Arnold McLaurin |
LYFT, INC. |
1:2023cv03644 |
December 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Civil Rights: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal by LYFT, INC.. (Kamalanathan, Ajente) |
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the #10 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 1/25/2024. (lccrc3) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant's response to the complaint shall be due by January 26, 2024. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 1/10/2024. (lccrc3) |
Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by LYFT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kamalanathan, Ajente) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Dionna Maria Lewis on behalf of ARNOLD MCLAURIN (Lewis, Dionna) |
Filing 7 ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Appearance by Dionna Maria Lewis on behalf of ARNOLD MCLAURIN (Lewis, Dionna); Modified on 1/3/2024 - Said pleading was entered in error at the request of counsel) (ztth). |
Filing 6 Receipt on 12/20/2023 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2023-CA-06664. (znmw) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 #5 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant's response to the complaint shall be due January 12, 2024. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 12/13/2023. (lccrc3) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Proposed Order by LYFT, INC. re #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Kamalanathan, Ajente) Modified on 12/13/2023 to correct event (zjm). |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by LYFT, INC.. (Kamalanathan, Ajente) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zrtw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ajente Kamalanathan on behalf of LYFT, INC. (Kamalanathan, Ajente) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District of Columbia Superior Court, case number 2023 CA 06664 Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADCDC-10544178 filed by LYFT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Kamalanathan, Ajente) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MCLAURIN v. LYFT, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arnold McLaurin | |
Represented By: | Dionna Maria Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LYFT, INC. | |
Represented By: | Ajente Kamalanathan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.