SAGE IT, INC. v. BLINKEN
SAGE IT, INC. and ANTHONY J. BLINKEN |
1:2023cv03682 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by ANTHONY J. BLINKEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Zubata, Jason) |
MINUTE ORDER. The defendant's unopposed #9 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. The defendant shall respond to the plaintiff's complaint on or before March 27, 2024. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 7, 2024. (lcdlf1) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Kyle Zubata on behalf of All Defendants (Zubata, Jason) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 2/25/2024, (mg) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/27/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/25/2024. (Tao, Dehai) Modified docket text on 1/4/2024 (mg). |
Filing 6 STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on December 22, 2023. (lcdlf1) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zcb) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by SAGE IT, INC..(Tao, Dehai) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by SAGE IT, INC..(Tao, Dehai) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to dehai@dehaitao.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. AO 440 Summons required. Do not add dates or case numbers to summons., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (cb, ) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by SAGE IT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney Office, #2 Summons Attorney General, #3 Summons Department of State)(Tao, Dehai) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY J. BLINKEN ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10549978) filed by SAGE IT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summon for Antony Blinken, #3 Summons Summon for Attorney General, #4 Summons Summon for US Attorney's Office)(Tao, Dehai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SAGE IT, INC. v. BLINKEN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: SAGE IT, INC. | |
Represented By: | Dehai Tao |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: ANTHONY J. BLINKEN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.