WATKINS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
SARAH WATKINS |
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
1:2023cv03691 |
December 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelley Renee Hebert on behalf of PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (Hebert, Shelley) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Shelley R. Hebert by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA re #10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Shelley Renee Hebert, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10662939. Fee Status: Fee Paid.. (Maffeo, Leslie) |
Filing 11 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Miller, Damon) |
|
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Shelley Renee Hebert, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10662939. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Maffeo, Leslie) |
|
NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re #8 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (Maffeo, Leslie).Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 1/29/2024. (zmrl) |
Filing 8 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (Maffeo, Leslie) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.(Maffeo, Leslie) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA served on 1/3/2024, answer due 1/24/2024 (Miller, Damon) |
|
Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by SARAH WATKINS filed by SARAH WATKINS.(Miller, Damon) |
Filing 2 ERRATA to Complaint by SARAH WATKINS. (Miller, Damon) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zljn) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to dmiller@benglasslaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet. (cb, ) |
Filing 1 ENTERED IN ERROR.....COMPLAINT against PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10551090) filed by SARAH WATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Miller, Damon) Modified on 12/19/2023 (zljn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.