RICKARDS v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
| Rupert Rickards |
| MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. |
| 1:2023cv03723 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Szymczyk, Alyssa) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before February 28, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/5/2024. (lcrc1)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Szymczyk, Alyssa) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before February 14, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/16/2024. (lcrc1)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(mg) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by RUPERT RICKARDS. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by RUPERT RICKARDS, #2 Errata filed by RUPERT RICKARDS. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Midland Credit Management, Inc.)(Styles, Jeffrey) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zljn) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA Correcting Initiating Pleading by RUPERT RICKARDS re #1 Complaint. (Styles, Jeffrey) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to jstyles@washlegal.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zrtw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10557103) filed by Rupert Rickards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Styles, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RICKARDS v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rupert Rickards | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Warren Styles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. | |
| Represented By: | Alyssa Lynn Szymczyk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
