EUGENE v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,
| MARK EUGENE |
| NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,, MR. COOPER, BRIAN GARDNER, NORTHWOODS HOLDINGS LLC, and CHRISTOPHER K. DOLAN |
| 1:2023cv03755 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Real Property: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #4 Order, Set Deadlines filed by MARK EUGENE. (mg)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #4 Order; Sent to Mark Eugene; New Address: unknown. (hmc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/22/2023. (hmc)
|
|
Filing 3
ERRATA to the COMPLAINT by MARK EUGENE. (zdp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2023: #1 Replacement Page 1,5,6) (zdp). Modified on 12/22/2023 (zdp).
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/19/2023. (lctnm2)
|
|
SUMMONS Not Issued as to All Defendants (zdp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206236) filed by MARK EUGENE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(zdp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
