CANTY v. FERGUSON
| Omarr S. Canty |
| Officer Thaddeus Ferguson and THADDEUS FERGUSON |
| 1:2023cv03781 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before March 13, 2024. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/5/2024. (lcrc1)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Plead or Otherwise Respond by THADDEUS FERGUSON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cole, Janice) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. THADDEUS FERGUSON served on 1/17/2024, answer due 2/7/2024 (Ford, Yaida) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/26/2024) (ztth). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to THADDEUS FERGUSON. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thaddeus Ferguson with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BDCDC-10583538) filed by Omarr S. Canty. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ford, Yaida) (Attachment 2 replaced on 12/27/2023) (zrtw). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
