MCDADE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
| STEPHANIE MCDADE |
| NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. doing business as AMTRAK |
| 1:2023cv03801 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (Davis, Alison) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP..(Davis, Alison) |
MINUTE ORDER: An Initial Scheduling Conference is set for March 1, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. by Zoom. The parties shall meet, confer, and submit a joint report pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule 16.3. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 2/1/2024. (lcjeb3)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/1/2024 at 3:30 PM by VTC before Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (lsj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexis Teresa Bosilovic on behalf of NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (Bosilovic, Alexis) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 2/1/2024. (znbn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) The Consent #5 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; and (2) Defendant shall respond to the #1 Complaint by February 1, 2024. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/12/2024. (lcjeb3)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File A Responsive Pleading by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, Alison) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. served on 12/28/2023, answer due 1/18/2024 (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (zljn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Address of Plaintiff and Defendant by STEPHANIE MCDADE (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10577617) filed by STEPHANIE MCDADE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Requested)(Thompson, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MCDADE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEPHANIE MCDADE | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. doing business as AMTRAK | |
| Represented By: | Alison N. Davis |
| Represented By: | Alexis Teresa Bosilovic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
