NWOSU v. BOLDUC et al
| ADAEZE NWOSU |
| MAGDALIT BOLDUC, LUC VAILLANT and ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER |
| 1:2023cv03841 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by ADAEZE NWOSU. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(mg) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to opposition to motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, MAGDALIT BOLDUC, LUC VAILLANT. (Golden, Marlan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret DiPentima Hedges on behalf of All Defendants (Hedges, Margaret) |
| Filing 12 Memorandum in opposition to re #8 Motion to Dismiss, filed by ADAEZE NWOSU. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(mg) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by ADAEZE NWOSU. (mg) |
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988), the plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the defendant's pending #8 Motion to Dismiss by February 12, 2024, may result in the Court (1) treating the motions as conceded, (2) ruling on the defendant's motion based on the defendant's arguments alone; or (3) dismissing the plaintiff's claims for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Minute Order to the plaintiff's address of record. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 31, 2024. (lcdlf1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #10 Motion for Recusal, the motion is DENIED. Although the plaintiff "has an active administrative and quasi-judicial appeal" pending against Yale University, that appeal does not create reasonable grounds to question the Court's impartiality and will not bias the Court against the plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. 455(a)-(b)(1). Indeed, the Court was not aware of the plaintiff's appeal prior to her motion. Judges regularly hear cases with far less tenuous connections to their former law schools. See, e.g., Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023). So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 31, 2024. (lcdlf1)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Recusal by ADAEZE NWOSU. (mg) |
| Filing 9 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, MAGDALIT BOLDUC, LUC VAILLANT (Golden, Marlan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, MAGDALIT BOLDUC, LUC VAILLANT. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Text of Proposed Order)(Golden, Marlan) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #7 Motion for CM/ECF password, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Under Local Rule 5.4(b), "a pro se party may obtain a CM/ECF username and password... with leave of Court. Whether of leave of Court should be granted is within the discretion of the judge to whom the case is assigned. To obtain leave of Court, the pro se party must file a written motion entitled 'Motion for CM/ECF User Name and Password,' describing the party's access to the internet, confirming the capacity to file documents and receive filings electronically on a regular basis, and certifying that he or she either has successfully completed the entire Clerk's Office on-line tutorial or has been permitted to file electronically in other federal courts." Here, the plaintiff's motion does not describe her access to the internet, confirm her capacity to file documents and receive filings electronically on a regular basis, or certify that she has successfully completed the requisite tutorial or has been permitted to file electronically in other federal courts. If the plaintiff files a new motion with the requisite information, the Court will be inclined to exercise its discretion so as to grant her leave to obtain a CM/ECF password. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 19, 2024. (lcdlf1)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by ADAEZE NWOSU. (mg) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER served on 1/10/2024, answer due 1/31/2024; MAGDALIT BOLDUC served on 1/9/2024, answer due 1/30/2024; LUC VAILLANT served on 1/9/2024, answer due 1/30/2024 (mg) |
| Filing 5 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by ADAEZE NWOSU (mg) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ADAEZE NWOSU.(mg) |
| Summons (3) Issued as to ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, MAGDALIT BOLDUC, LUC VAILLANT; provided to Plaintiff in person. (mg) |
|
Filing 3
STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 2, 2024. (lcdlf1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #2 Motion for a CM/ECF Password, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice. Under this Court's Local Rules, "[a] pro se party may obtain a CM/ECF username and password from the Clerk with leave of Court. Whether leave of the Court should be granted is within the discretion of the judge to whom the case is assigned." At this time, the Court does not anticipate that a CM/ECF username and password will be necessary for the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice. The Court will reconsider its decision after the defendants have been properly served. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 2, 2024. (lcdlf1)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by ADAEZE NWOSU. (mg) . |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to All Defendants (zdp) Modified on 1/3/2024 (zdp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206319) filed by ADAEZE NWOSU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(zdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
