IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
Plaintiff: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Respondent: JEFFREY B. CLARK and D.C. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Case Number: 1:2023mc00007
Filed: January 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Cross MOTION to Consolidate Cases by JEFFREY B. CLARK. (See Docket Entry #5 to view document.) (ztth)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RESPONSE re #4 Third MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by JEFFREY B. CLARK. (Burnham, Charles)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Third MOTION to Remand to State Court by D.C. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Fox, Hamilton)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zljn)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing fee received: $ 49, receipt number: 203936. (zljn)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by JEFFREY B. CLARK. Case related to Case No. 1:22mc117. (Burnham, Charles)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by JEFFREY B. CLARK filed by JEFFREY B. CLARK.(Burnham, Charles)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from DC Court of Appeals, case number 22-BD-039 Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-9814019 filed by JEFFREY B. CLARK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email, #2 Exhibit Email, #3 Exhibit Declaration, #4 Exhibit Email, #5 Exhibit Email, #6 Exhibit Email, #7 Exhibit Subpoena, #8 Exhibit Email with Draft Motion, #9 Exhibit Email, #10 Exhibit Continuance Motion Filed, #11 Exhibit Email, #12 Exhibit Email, #13 Exhibit Email, #14 Exhibit DCCA Order)(Burnham, Charles)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to charles@burnhamgorokhov.com, cc'd -1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Filing fee for miscellaneous case not paid. Please remit filing fee payment via check or money order. In the future, do not file these kinds of cases electronically., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zljn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEFFREY B. CLARK
Represented By: Charles Burnham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.C. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Represented By: Hamilton P. Fox, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?