HESTER et al v. HESTER
| ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. and MLI RX, LLC |
| TIMOTHY C. HESTER |
| 1:2023mc00033 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #1 Petitioners' Motion to Enforce and granting #5 Respondent's Motion to Quash. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4-17-2023. (lcrc3)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #5 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Demuth, Bradley) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Raymond Nicholas Barto on behalf of MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. (Barto, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Demuth on behalf of MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. (Demuth, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 Memorandum in opposition to re #1 Motion to Enforce filed by TIMOTHY C. HESTER. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Pistilli, Christian) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Quash Subpoena by TIMOTHY C. HESTER. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Pistilli, Christian) |
| MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioners may file a reply on or before April 12, 2023 at noon. SO ORDERED. (lcrc3) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Process and Subpoena by MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Process Server)(Vanek, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Raymond N. Barto, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9983178. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Raymond N. Barto in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Vanek, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Bradley J. Demuth, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9982948. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Bradley J. Demuth in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit A - Cert. of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Vanek, Joseph) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for Respondent Timothy C. Hester shall respond to #1 Petitioners' Motion to Enforce on or before April 10, 2023. A hearing will not be scheduled unless the Court deems it necessary. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4-7-2023. (lcrc3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #2 #3 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: It is hereby ORDERED that Bradley J. Demuth and Raymond N. Barto are admitted to represent Petitioners pro hac vice in this case. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 4-7-2023. (lcrc3) Modified on 4/7/2023 to correct linkage.(ztnr)
|
| Filing fee received: $ 49, receipt number: 204366. (ztth) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Enforce by MLI RX, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
