FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000 |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC WALDOW, THOMAS LOYD, JOHN DOE USCP OFFICERS 1-50, ROBERT GLOVER, DANIEL THAU, JAMES CRISMAN, JOHN DOES MPD OFFICERS 1-50, STEVEN SUND, YOGANANDA PITTMAN, MURIEL BOWSER, NANCY PELOSI and US CAPITOL POLICE BOARD |
| 1:2024cv00044 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MURIEL BOWSER, JAMES CRISMAN, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ROBERT GLOVER, JOHN DOE USCP OFFICERS 1-50, JOHN DOES MPD OFFICERS 1-50, THOMAS LOYD, NANCY PELOSI, YOGANANDA PITTMAN, STEVEN SUND, DANIEL THAU, US CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC WALDOW ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206371) with Jury Demand filed by ALAN E. FISCHER. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) |
| Summons (13) Issued as to MURIEL BOWSER, JAMES CRISMAN, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ROBERT GLOVER, THOMAS LOYD, NANCY PELOSI, YOGANANDA PITTMAN, STEVEN SUND, DANIEL THAU, US CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC WALDOW. (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
