TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CARROLL et al
| TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| ANNGELIQUE C. CARROLL, ANGELIQUE C. CARROLL and DIANNE DUNN |
| 1:2024cv00145 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/17/24. (lcrdm2)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to ANNGELIQUE C. CARROLL, DIANNE DUNN. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA (Williams, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10623135) filed by TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Williams, Joel) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
