COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P. v. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Plaintiff: COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P., and COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P.
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Case Number: 1:2024cv00150
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Reggie B Walton
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE.(Littman, M.)
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. To ensure the expeditious resolution of this action, and because this qualifies as an exempted case under Local Civil Rule 16.3(b), it is hereby ORDERED that, on or before March 28, 2024, the parties shall file a joint proposed briefing schedule governing further proceedings. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on February 29, 2024. (lcrbw2)
February 12, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sara Benson on behalf of COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P. (Benson, Sara)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE THE HONORABLE REGGIE B. WALTON. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on February 12, 2024. (lcrbw2)
February 12, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by M. Jared Littman on behalf of OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (Littman, M.)
January 19, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
January 19, 2024 Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zcb)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 and 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P., (Gierhart, Cynthia) Modified on 1/19/2024 (zcb).
January 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10624616) filed by COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P.,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Gierhart, Cynthia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P. v. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P.,
Represented By: Cynthia Gierhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES, L.P.
Represented By: Sara Benson
Represented By: Cynthia Gierhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?