LAMBERT v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS et al
| TAYLOR LAMBERT |
| INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, TIMOTHY DRISCOLL and CANDICE DUBBERLY |
| 1:2024cv00227 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by TAYLOR LAMBERT (zjm) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to opposition to motion re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by TAYLOR LAMBERT. (zjm) |
| Filing 12 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by TAYLOR LAMBERT (zjm) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Proposed Order for Opposition to Motion for Remand by TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS re #10 Memorandum in Opposition (Kekacs, Caitlin) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum in opposition to re #9 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS. (Kekacs, Caitlin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by TAYLOR LAMBERT. (zjm) |
Filing 8
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/12/2024. (DM)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff to file a response to #7 by 2/15/2024. Defendants shall then file a reply by 2/22/2024. (dot) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Defendants' #7 Motion to Dismiss. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response by FEBRUARY 15, 2024; Defendants shall then file a reply by FEBRUARY 22, 2024.The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs address of record. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/2/24. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim by TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kekacs, Caitlin) |
| Filing 6 Receipt on 1/29/2024 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2023-CAB-006710. (znmw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zsl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kara Naseef on behalf of TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS (Naseef, Kara) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS. Case related to Case No. 1:23-CV-00309, 1:23-CV-2109, 1:24-CV-00222. (Kekacs, Caitlin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Caitlin Diane Kekacs on behalf of TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, CANDICE DUBBERLY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS (Kekacs, Caitlin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2023-CAB-006710 Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADCDC-10644233 filed by CANDICE DUBBERLY, TIMOTHY DRISCOLL, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit State Court Proceedings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kekacs, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
