ROBBINS v. DWYER et al
| IVA ROBBINS |
| MOLLY C. DWYER, SUSAN GILMIS and STEPHANIE MCMAHON |
| 1:2024cv00318 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Service of Process by U.S Marshal. The Court hereby denies #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Waive Cost for Service of Process by U.S. Marshal as moot. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 2/7/2024. (lccrc2)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by IVA ROBBINS.(zjm) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by IVA ROBBINS (zjm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw Services of Process by U.S Marshal by IVA ROBBINS. (zjm) |
| SUMMONS (5) Issued as to MOLLY C. DWYER, SUSAN GILMIS, STEPHANIE MCMAHON, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zjm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Waive Cost for Services of process by U.S. Marshal by IVA ROBBINS. (Attachment: #1 IFP)(zjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MOLLY C. DWYER, SUSAN GILMIS, STEPHANIE MCMAHON ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206556) filed by IVA ROBBINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to MOLLY C. DWYER, SUSAN GILMIS, STEPHANIE MCMAHON (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
