DANTZLER v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC. et al
| OSCAR DANTZLER |
| OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., CHARLES L. SPICER, JR., ASHLEY EDWARDS BASS, ANDRE COUDRAIN, INDIGO K. DIEKMANN, GARY STANGA, CLERK OF COURT OFFICE and JOHN BEL EDWARDS |
| 1:2024cv00321 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by OSCAR DANTZLER. (zjm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by OSCAR DANTZLER. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(zjm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by OSCAR DANTZLER. Case related to Case No. 22-cv-02003-CRC. (zjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLERK OF COURT OFFICE, ANDRE COUDRAIN, INDIGO K. DIEKMANN, JOHN BEL EDWARDS, ASHLEY EDWARDS BASS, OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., CHARLES L. SPICER, JR, GARY STANGA ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206558) with Jury Demand filed by OSCAR DANTZLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Summons)(zjm) |
| Summons (8) Issued as to CLERK OF COURT OFFICE, ANDRE COUDRAIN, INDIGO K. DIEKMANN, JOHN BEL EDWARDS, ASHLEY EDWARDS BASS, OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., CHARLES L. SPICER, JR, GARY STANGA. (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
