KEZERASHVILI v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
| DAVID KEZERASHVILI |
| U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION |
| 1:2024cv00470 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION served on 2/28/2024 (Bord, Eric) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(mg) |
| Filing 4 ERRATA Summons by DAVID KEZERASHVILI re #3 Request for Summons to Issue. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Bord, Eric) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by DAVID KEZERASHVILI. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Bord, Eric) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (mg) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to eric.bord@morganlewis.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. Request Summons (FOIA) (mg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by DAVID KEZERASHVILI filed by DAVID KEZERASHVILI.(Bord, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under the Freedom of Information Act for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10698645) filed by DAVID KEZERASHVILI. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Bord, Eric) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to eric.bord@morganlewis.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (mg, ) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to eric.bord@morganlewis.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Attorney is provisional. Please renew your membership. See https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (mg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KEZERASHVILI v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID KEZERASHVILI | |
| Represented By: | Eric S. Bord |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
