SINGH v. MAYORKAS et al
ABHINAV SINGH |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ALISSA L. EMMEL |
1:2024cv00492 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABHINAV SINGH (Meyer, Brandon) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #4 Notice, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 11, 2024. (lcldf1) |
Filing 3 STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 28, 2024. (lcdlf1) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zljn) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10703781) filed by ABHINAV SINGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover, #3 Summons as to Alejandro Mayorkas, #4 Summons as to Ur M. Jaddou, #5 Summons as to Alissa L. Emmel, #6 Summons as to the United States Attorney's Office, #7 Summons as to the Attorney General of the United States)(Meyer, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.