BLACK v. O'MALLEY
| KATHERINE M. BLACK |
| MARTIN O'MALLEY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2024cv00601 |
| March 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to andrewsindler@gmail.com, cc'd 5 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmw, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- James Gannon, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10727224. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by Katherine M. Black. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing- Movant)(Sindler, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10727223) filed by Katherine M. Black. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons- Attorney General, #3 Summons Summons- Commissioner, #4 Summons Summons- OGC)(Sindler, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
