SUDERSHAN v. BLINKEN et al
| MUDLAPUR KRISHNAMURTHY SUDERSHAN |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, RUSSEL JOHN BROWN, UNITED STATES EMBASSY NEW DELHI and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2024cv00607 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to bdn@gip-us.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (znmw, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Petition for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10730550) filed by MUDLAPUR KRISHNAMURTHY SUDERSHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Exhibit)(Neuman, Brandon) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/5/2024) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
