SATYAM et al v. BLINKEN et al
| VENKATESH SATYAM and DEEPIKA DAMMALA |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ERIC GARCETTI, BRENDAN MULLARKEY, JOHN DOE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 1:2024cv00662 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by DEEPIKA DAMMALA, VENKATESH SATYAM (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, ERIC GARCETTI, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, BRENDAN MULLARKEY, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10740658) filed by DEEPIKA DAMMALA, VENKATESH SATYAM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A to F, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons for Secretary of State Antony Blinken, #5 Summons for Assistant Secretary of State Rena Bitter, #6 Summons for U.S. Ambassador Eric Garcetti, #7 Summons for Consul Brendan Mullarkey, #8 Summons for NIV Officer John Doe, #9 Summons for Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, #10 Summons for FBI Director Christopher Wray, #11 Summons for US Attorney General Merrick Garland, #12 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
