SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WHITTIER HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., MONTEREY PARK HOSPITAL, GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER, GREATER EL MONTE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, BAPTIST ST. ANTHONYS HOSPITAL, ASANTE THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL, UNICOI COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, HOLSTON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, SYCAMORE SHOALS HOSPITAL, HAWKINS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHNSON CITY MEDICAL CENTER, INDIAN PATH MEDICAL CENTER, FRANKLIN WOODS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, NORTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, RUSSELL COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, LEE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, MOUNTAIN VIEW REGIONAL HOSPITAL, SMYTH COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, LONESOME PINE HOSPITAL, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS HOSPITAL KINO, WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL, BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE MEDICAL CENTER IRVING, ALL PLAINTIFFS and BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE MEDICAL CENTER IRVING |
XAVIER BECERRA |
1:2024cv00800 |
March 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Contract: Recovery Medicare |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER: The deadline for any objection to the consolidation of San Gabriel Valley Medical Center v. Becerra, 24-cv-800, and Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Becerra, 24-cv-972, under Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, shall be extended to 14 days after service of the complaint. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 4/19/2024. (lccrc2) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by XAVIER BECERRA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudak, Brian) |
MINUTE ORDER: The parties are hereby directed to notify the Court by April 17, 2024, of any objection to consolidating San Gabriel Valley Medical Center v. Becerra, 24-cv-800, and Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Becerra, 24-cv-972, under Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 4/10/2024. (lccrc2) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Sedley, Alan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (mg) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to asedley@fentonlawgroup.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (mg, ) Modified text on 3/20/2024 (znmw). |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sedley, Alan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against XAVIER BECERRA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10766999) filed by SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sedley, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.