POWELL v. O'MALLEY
| ANGELA DENISE POWELL |
| MARTIN O'MALLEY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2024cv00827 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall assign this action randomly to a judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/1/2024. (znmw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (znmw) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to MARTIN O'MALLEY Electronic notice has been provided to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the U.S. Attorney's Office pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405g. Answer due by 7/3/2024. (znmw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Elliott on behalf of MARTIN O'MALLEY (Elliott, Scott) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANGELA DENISE POWELL. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN O'MALLEY filed by ANGELA DENISE POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(zcb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 03/20/2024. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
