GHAED v. PETROVICH et al
| MOHAMMADALI GHAED |
| PEGGY PETROVICH, ANTHONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, MERRICK B. GARLAND and MATHEW M. GRAVES |
| 1:2024cv00921 |
| March 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/1/2024. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTHONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, MATHEW M. GRAVES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, PEGGY PETROVICH, RICHARD C. VISEK ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10792382) filed by Mohammadali GHAED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons)(Aramesh, Arash) (Attachment 6 replaced on 4/1/2024) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
