HASSON v. NEW VISION PROPERTIES LLC et al
| John Appleton Hasson |
| Justin Sprinzen, Nicole Sprinzen and New Vision Properties LLC |
| 1:2024cv01098 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the #9 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendants' Responsive Pleading shall be filed on or before July 29, 2024. If the parties execute a settlement agreement prior to that time, they shall promptly inform the Court. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 5/24/2024. (lctnm3)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by NEW VISION PROPERTIES LLC, JUSTIN SPRINZEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Keene, Jesse) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal re Nicole Sprinzen by JOHN APPLETON HASSON (Ader, Benjamin) |
|
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER: In light of the #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, the Court ORDERS that all claims against Defendant Nicole Sprinzen are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Fed. R. Civ P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 5/23/2024. (lctnm3) Modified on 5/23/2024 (hmc).
|
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NEW VISION PROPERTIES LLC served on 5/6/2024, answer due 5/27/2024 (Ader, Benjamin) Modified event on 5/14/2024 (mg). |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NICOLE SPRINZEN served on 5/6/2024, answer due 5/27/2024 (Ader, Benjamin) Modified event on 5/14/2024 (mg). |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JUSTIN SPRINZEN served on 5/6/2024, answer due 5/27/2024 (Ader, Benjamin) Modified event on 5/14/2024 (mg). |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #5 Certificate of Service; emailed to bader@tatebywater.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Please note the following for future filings; do not refile document, 2. Incorrect event used, 3. Future filings may be ENTERED IN ERROR, 4. Event corrected. (mg, ) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 4/22/2024. (lctnm3)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (znmw) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA Complaint with Complete Party addresses by JOHN APPLETON HASSON. (Ader, Benjamin) |
| NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding #1 Complaint,. The following error(s) need correction: Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file a Notice of Errata stating the error and attach the corrected initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party and file using the event Errata. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BDCDC-10836478) filed by John Appleton Hasson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3)(Ader, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
