YI v. JADDOU et al
| BING YI |
| UR MENDOZA JADDOU and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
| 1:2024cv01694 |
| June 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by BING YI. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by BING YI.(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-10956784) filed by BING YI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cleveland, David) |
| NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding #1 Complaint. The following error(s) need correction: Missing summonses- U.S. government. When naming a U.S. government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. Missing/Incorrect summonses. Please locate the summons applicable to your case at www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms and filing using the event Request for Summons to issue. (mg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
