MAJOKA et al v. SCHOFER et al
TAHA ANSAR MAJOKA, SAMAN ANSAR and ANSAR AHMED MAJOKA |
ANDREW SCHOFER and ANTONY BLINKEN |
1:2024cv02104 |
July 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Loren L AliKhan |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/22/2024. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/20/2024.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 07/29/24., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 7/29/2024; ANDREW SCHOFER served on 7/29/2024 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Loren L. AliKhan. (znmw) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SCHOFER ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11034135) filed by ANSAR AHMED MAJOKA, TAHA ANSAR MAJOKA, SAMAN ANSAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.