CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION v. MOSSI
CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION |
DANTE MOSSI |
1:2024cv02544 |
September 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ERRATA - NOTICE OF ERRATA RE: MISSING ADDRESSES IN COMPLAINT by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Errata - Corrected Complaint)(Crain, Lee) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Azucena Marquez, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11136700. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Azucena Marquez, #2 Certificate of Good Standing for Azucena Marquez, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Crain, Lee) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- ROBERT GIANNATTASIO, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11136656. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Robert Giannattasio, #2 Certificate of Good Standing for Robert Giannattsio, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Crain, Lee) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- ANNE CHAMPION, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11136556. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Anne Champion, #2 Certificate of Good Standing for Anne Champion, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Crain, Lee) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (Crain, Lee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANTE MOSSI with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11136348) filed by CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Crain, Lee) |
NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding #1 Complaint. The following error(s) need correction: Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file a Notice of Errata stating the error and attach the corrected initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party and file using the event Errata. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION v. MOSSI | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CENTRAL AMERICAN BANK FOR ECONOMIC INTEGRATION | |
Represented By: | Lee Ross Crain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DANTE MOSSI | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.