AMDANI BAI v. BLINKEN et al
| Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai |
| Antony Blinken and US Department of State |
| 1:2024cv03138 |
| November 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Tamara Rozina, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11281414. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Firestone, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Maloney on behalf of Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai (Maloney, Mary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan Alexis Miller on behalf of Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai (Miller, Morgan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Firestone on behalf of Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai (Firestone, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, US Department of State ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11281298) filed by Mohammad Yusuf Amandi Bai. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Exhibit 1, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Exhibit 3)(Firestone, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
